What must be discussed if one's opinion differs from the Department's standing in the JR?

When discussing differences in opinion regarding the Department's standing in a Judicial Review (JR), it is essential to bring these concerns to a staffing meeting. Staffing meetings serve as a collaborative space where team members, including social workers, supervisors, and other stakeholders, can discuss case specifics and differing viewpoints. This setting encourages open dialogue, problem-solving, and decision-making about the child's welfare and the case plan.

It's crucial that any differences in opinion are addressed in a constructive manner within the team before they impact court proceedings or other formal settings. This approach helps ensure that all perspectives are considered, and it allows for a unified strategy when the case is presented in court or at a public hearing.

In contrast, public hearings and court appearances are more formal settings that may not be conducive to constructive discussion of differing opinions. Similarly, the case plan document may reflect the consensus reached but does not serve as the initial forum for discussing dissenting views prior to solidifying decisions in the case plan.